For a Jurisprudential Review: Objective Theory vs. Equitable Intervention: The Taylor v Johnson Precedent in Australia.

 For a Jurisprudential Review: 

Objective Theory vs. Equitable Intervention: 

The Taylor v Johnson Precedent in Australia.


Here is a simplified 5-sentence breakdown of the High Court’s decision in Taylor v Johnson (1983):

1.     Mrs. Johnson offered to sell land to Mr. Taylor, but she was mistakenly thinking the price was per acre rather than a total price for the whole property.

2.     Mr. Taylor realized she was making a serious mistake about the price, but he deliberately stayed silent to ensure she didn't find out.

3.     Under strict common law, the contract was technically valid because both parties appeared to agree on the written terms.

4.     However, the High Court ruled that in equity, a contract can be set aside if one party knows the other is mistaken and "strikes while the iron is hot" to prevent the mistake from being corrected.

5.     The court ultimately declared the contract voidable because Mr. Taylor’s conduct was unconscionable, ensuring that fairness prevails over a literal reading of the document.

Summary of the "Objective Theory" vs "Equity"

Legal Principle

Court's View in Taylor v Johnson

Common Law

The contract is valid because the written "objective" signs of agreement were there.

Equity

The contract is voidable because the non-mistaken party acted unfairly by hiding the truth.


️ Profile: Judge Nazmul Hasan

Nazmul Hasan

Senior Judicial Magistrate | Prime Minister Gold Medalist 

Nazmul Hasan is a highly accomplished judicial officer and legal scholar from Bangladesh, distinguished by a rare blend of judicial service excellence and unparalleled academic achievement.


⚖️ Professional Expertise

Title

Achievement / Service

Details

Senior Judicial Magistrate

Bangladesh Judicial Service (BJS)

Serving as a Senior Judicial Magistrate, demonstrating profound expertise in dispensing justice and administering court procedures.

Service Rank

11th Bangladesh Judicial Service (BJS)

Secured the 7th Merit Position overall in the rigorous 11th BJS competitive examination, marking an exceptional start to a distinguished judicial career.


🎓 Academic Distinction

Qualification

Institution

Recognition

LL.B. (Hons.)

University of Rajshahi

First Class First (Top of the Cohort), signifying ultimate academic mastery in undergraduate legal studies.

LL.M.

University of Rajshahi

Achieved First Class standing, further solidifying expertise and specialized knowledge in advanced legal disciplines.


Honors & Achievements (Awards of Excellence)

·       Prime Minister Gold Medalist (2017)

Awarded the nation's most prestigious academic honor for outstanding performance across all disciplines at the university level.

·       Agrani Bank Gold Medalist for Academic Excellence (2023)

Recognized with this distinguished medal for sustained academic excellence and leadership in the field of law.

 Direct Communication

For professional inquiries, speaking engagements, or academic collaborations, please reach out via:

Professional Portfolios

·                   SSRN Author Page: SSRN | Nazmul Hasan

 o   Access a digital library of research papers, including works on the "Architecture of Sovereignty" and the "Judicial Sentinel."

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

17th BJS Viva Preparation by Judge Nazmul Hasan.

100 Legal Maxims for 18th BJS Exam and Law Students.

BJS প্রিলিমিনারি পরীক্ষায় সফল হওয়ার টিপস: প্রত্যেক পরীক্ষার্থীর জন্য গুরুত্বপূর্ণ পরামর্শ