নারী ও শিশু নির্যাতন দমন আইন, ২০০০ এর অধীনে মিথ্যা মামলা, অভিযোগ দায়ের এর শাস্তি

-

 

নারী ও শিশু নির্যাতন দমন আইন, ২০০০

( ২০০০ সনের ৮ নং আইন )



 মিথ্যা মামলা, অভিযোগ দায়ের ইত্যাদির শাস্তি

১৭। (১) যদি কোন ব্যক্তি অন্য কোন ব্যক্তির ক্ষতিসাধনের অভিপ্রায়ে উক্ত ব্যক্তির বিরুদ্ধে এই আইনের অন্য কোন ধারার অধীন মামলা বা অভিযোগ করার জন্য ন্যায্য বা আইনানুগ কারণ নাই জানিয়াও মামলা বা অভিযোগ দায়ের করেন বা করান তাহা হইলে মামলা বা অভিযোগ দায়েরকারী ব্যক্তি এবং যিনি অভিযোগ দায়ের করাইয়াছেন উক্ত ব্যক্তি অনধিক সাত বৎসর সশ্রম কারাদণ্ডে দণ্ডিত হইবেন এবং ইহার অতিরিক্ত অর্থদণ্ডেও দণ্ডনীয় হইবেন।

(২) কোন ব্যক্তির লিখিত অভিযোগের ভিত্তিতে ট্রাইব্যুনাল উপ-ধারা (১) এর অধীন সংঘটিত অপরাধের অভিযোগ গ্রহণ ও মামলার বিচার করিতে পারিবে।

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LL.B.(Hons.) and BJS Exam Preparation: Differences Between Section 8 and Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877.

-
Image
  Differences Between Section 8 and Section 9, Specific Relief Act, 1877. A brief note on the differences between Section 8 and Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 concerning the recovery of immovable property is provided below: Feature Section 8: Recovery of specific immoveable property Section 9: Suit by person dispossessed of immoveable property Basis of Suit Based on the title (legal ownership or superior proprietary right) and the right to present possession. Based solely on prior physical possession and illegal dispossession. Nature of Suit A regular suit for possession, often involving a declaration of title. A summary remedy that avoids an investigation into the title of the parties. Limitation Period The general limitation period for recovery of immovable property based on title applies, which is typically 12 y...
Read more

Bangladesh Judicial Service (BJS) Written – Probable Problematic Question & Answer Series.

-
Image
  Topic: From Conflict to Clarity: Can a Nari-O-Shishu Tribunal Convict Under Section 302 Penal Code When Dowry Element Fails? The Definitive Appellate Division Position (2023–2024) Question: The accused was charged, tried, and initially convicted by a Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal under section 11(ka) read with section 30 of the Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 for causing the death of his wife allegedly in connection with dowry demand and torture. During the full trial, the prosecution successfully proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the death of the victim by inflicting injuries amounting to culpable homicide amounting to murder, but utterly failed to establish any dowry demand, prior torture linked to dowry, or any nexus between dowry and the killing. Discuss critically whether: (a) The Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal (as trial court) has the jurisdiction and power to alter/amend the charge and convict the accused under sectio...
Read more

18th BJS preparation Series: The legal maxim-" ignorantia facti excusat, ignorantia legis neminem excusat." under the Penal Code, 1860.

-
Image
  Question - Discuss critically the maxim " Ignorantia Juris non excusat " and its application in Penal Code, 1860. Answer : Section 76 and Section 79 of the Penal Code, 1860 deal with mistake of fact. Ignorance of law is not excused and igno rance of fact can be excused is a general rule. Mistake of Fact (Section 76 and Section 79) Section 76 Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact believing himself bound, by law 76. Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is, or who by reason of a mistake of fact and not by reason of a mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by law to do it. Illustrations (a) A, a soldier, fires on a mob by the order of his superior officer, in conformity with the commands of the law. A has committed no offence. (b) A, an officer of a Court of Justice, being ordered by that Court to arrest Y, and, after due enquiry, believing Z to be Y, arrests Z. A has committed no offence. Essentials :-   act mus...
Read more